‘Selected Rishabh Pant on basis of…’: Fans slam BCCI for picking Pant over Samson

Fans React to Rishabh Pant’s Selection Over Sanju Samson for Champions Trophy 2025

In a recent press conference attended by Rohit Sharma and Ajit Agarkar, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) announced the squads for the upcoming Champions Trophy 2025. While the announcement brought excitement, it also ignited a wave of controversy among cricket enthusiasts, particularly regarding the selection of wicketkeeper-batsman Rishabh Pant over Sanju Samson.

BCCI’s Decision Sparks Outrage

The decision to choose Pant has faced significant backlash from fans, many of whom believe that Sanju Samson deserved a spot in the squad. Social media platforms erupted with comments expressing disappointment and confusion over the selectors’ choice. Some fans highlighted Samson’s consistent performances and recent form, arguing that he should have been prioritized for this prestigious tournament.

What Fans Are Saying

Many fans took to Twitter and other social media platforms to voice their opinions, with comments ranging from humorous takes on the selection process to serious critiques of the BCCI’s decision-making. One fan quipped, “Maybe they think Pant’s flashy style will outshine Samson’s steady gameplay!”

Others pointed out that the decision seemed to overlook the current form and fitness levels of both players. “Samson has been in better form lately; it’s baffling why Pant was chosen,” remarked another cricket aficionado.

The Road Ahead

As the cricketing world gears up for the Champions Trophy 2025, fans are left to wonder if this decision will impact India’s chances in the tournament. With high expectations surrounding the squad, the selectors will need to justify their choices as the competition unfolds.

For the latest updates on cricket news, player performances, and fan reactions, make sure to visit Looffers.com.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Looffers = Loot + Offers
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare
0