Microblogging Platform X Challenges Government Censorship
NEW DELHI: Microblogging platform X has filed a petition in the Karnataka High Court, aiming to protect its operations from what it describes as “coercive or prejudicial action” by various government departments. The platform contends that actions taken under laws other than Section 69A of the IT Act violate its rights and disrupt its ability to function effectively.
Legal Grounds for the Petition
The petition asserts that unlawful blocking orders harm the X platform and infringe upon its rights under Articles 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. These articles ensure equality before the law and the right to life and personal liberty, respectively. Moreover, X argues that such actions violate Article 301, which protects the right to conduct business without unreasonable government interference.
Concerns Over the Sahyog Portal
X’s petition also criticizes the Union government’s Sahyog portal, labeling it “nothing but a censorship tool.” The platform claims that this portal represents a misuse of power, violating Articles 162 and 246 of the Constitution.
Government’s Response
In response, the government is reportedly reviewing the issues raised by X. They are engaging in dialogue with representatives from the xAI platform, which has introduced Grok, to understand its response framework and the nature of queries submitted to it.
Potential Legal Implications
Sources indicate that if the platform fails to remove unlawful content, it could face prosecution under Indian laws alongside the individuals who posted the inflammatory queries. The government is keeping a close watch on this evolving situation.
For more insights into the world of online platforms and legal matters, visit Looffers.com.
