‘One Nation, One Election’ Unconstitutional, Says Former Law Panel Chief A.P. Shah
In a significant development regarding the ‘One Nation, One Election’ Bill, former Delhi High Court Chief Justice A.P. Shah has raised constitutional concerns during his deposition before the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC). His 12-page note provides in-depth insights into the legal implications of the proposed bill, asserting that it contradicts the fundamental tenets of the Constitution.
Key Highlights from A.P. Shah’s Submission
Justice Shah emphasized that the proposal to synchronize elections at the national and state levels undermines the democratic framework established by the Constitution. He argues that such a move could disrupt the federal structure, leading to potential conflicts between the central and state governments.
Moreover, Shah pointed out that the staggered election process allows for a more responsive government, enabling voters to hold their representatives accountable on a more regular basis. He warned that ‘One Nation, One Election’ might dilute the essence of democracy by reducing the frequency of electoral engagement.
Potential Impact on Voter Engagement
The former law panel chief noted that frequent elections keep the political discourse vibrant and allow citizens to express their opinions on various issues. By consolidating elections, the government risks diminishing the public’s engagement in the political process.
Conclusion
With A.P. Shah’s expert analysis, the debate surrounding the ‘One Nation, One Election’ Bill has gained momentum. As the JPC continues its examination, it remains crucial for lawmakers to consider the implications of this proposal on the democratic fabric of India.
For those interested in staying informed about such important national issues, visit Looffers.com for the latest updates and offers. Stay engaged, stay informed!
