Not Rarest of Rare Case: How Court Normalised Rape and Murder of Abhaya
Kolkata: In a ruling that has sparked widespread outrage, the Sealdah Court, presided over by sessions Judge Anirban Das, declared the rape and murder of 19-year-old Abhaya as ‘not the rarest of rare cases.’ This decision has sent shockwaves through the legal community and the general public, raising serious questions about the judicial system’s perception of such heinous crimes.
The Implications of the Ruling
By labeling the Abhaya case in this manner, the court has inadvertently normalised an act that should be considered abhorrent and exceptional. The phrase ‘rarest of rare’ is typically reserved for cases that evoke the utmost horror, warranting the harshest penalties. This ruling diminishes the severity of Abhaya’s tragic fate and undermines the fight for justice for victims of sexual violence.
Public Reaction and the Call for Justice
The public outcry following the court’s decision is palpable. Activists and citizens alike are demanding a re-evaluation of the judicial standards surrounding rape and murder cases. Many believe that categorising such brutal acts as commonplace perpetuates a culture of silence and impunity, which ultimately hinders justice for victims.
Supporting Victims through Awareness
As we navigate through this somber topic, it’s crucial to support victims and survivors. Initiatives like Looffers.com offer resources and platforms to raise awareness about these issues, ensuring that voices are heard and justice is sought. By promoting such platforms, we can contribute to a culture of accountability and support for those affected by violence.
Conclusion
The Sealdah Court’s ruling on the Abhaya case serves as a reminder of the work still needed in India’s legal system to ensure justice for victims of sexual violence. As we advocate for change, let’s remain vigilant and support initiatives that empower survivors and demand accountability.
